Your restoration project, made viable and guaranteed.

Land analysis, cost model, design, planting, guaranteed results.

Trusted by

  • Suzano
  • Mosaic
  • Hydro
  • Future Climate
  • Google

In restoration, the numbers rarely add up.

Cost and risk are fixed before anyone reads the land.

Cost

Traditional methods, applied uniformly across the whole area, push costs up and returns down.

Risk

Climate risk and uncertainty on the outcome make it hard to commit capital, or to price the risk at all.

Rework

When a planting underperforms and has to be redone, that cost lands on the project.

The result

So the land that could be restored stays degraded.

Get your project financed, delivered and guaranteed.

MORFO is the missing link between capital and nature.

Land analysis

Know what the land needs before you budget.

A full read of the terrain, from satellite to soil.

41%

of the land regenerates on its own, no planting

Learn more about our method
Regeneration design

Build a plan investors and the field trust.

A plan your investors can fund and your teams can run.

82

cost per hectare, down from 100

Learn more about our method
Operations

Get the project delivered with guaranteed results.

Carried out on the ground, with a guarantee on the result.

On track

monitored to the contracted target

Learn more about our method

Modeled values from one real area, anonymised.

hectares analysed
projects started
biomes: Amazon, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest
hectares under management

French Guiana, former gold-mining site: from bare mining ground to continuous vegetation cover, NDVI-confirmed, in about three years.

Watch on YouTube

Four reasons whyGooglechose to work with MORFO

1The right method

Get the whole plan set, area by area

Soil, method, species and maintenance, set from the read of each area. MORFO answers for the target in the contract, on the cases it covers.

Method mix
  • Natural regeneration45%
  • Assisted regeneration35%
  • Targeted planting20%
2The guarantee

A result guaranteed in the contract

We commit to ecological targets in the contract, and fix any miss at our cost.

Stem density48% of target
Species diversity62% of target
Carbon sequestration41% of target
3The science

A method proven with published science

Methods built and tested with Brazilian research institutions, and sharper with every project.

4MORFO Ri

Our platform: see what your land can deliver, before you invest

MORFO Ri reads your land and predicts what to restore, which method, and at what cost, before the first tree.

The MORFO Ri platform: restoration plan, site scoring and carbon revenue views
Explore the platform

Explore our projects and results

One area in the Cerrado. Two restoration models on the same land.

This is what a viable, investable project looks like in numbers: lower cost, protected upside, and a result under contract. One model applies a single recipe to every hectare. MORFO reads the land zone by zone, leaves what can regenerate on its own, and commits to the result.

Satellite view of Area B, a restoration site in the CerradoStandard approach

One uniform recipe applied across the entire cadastral perimeter.

MORFO zone-calibrated planting strategy across seven operational zonesWith MORFO

Zone-calibrated strategy, with natural regeneration and exclusion areas identified.

-20%

Treated surface

Natural regeneration and non-viable areas identified during diagnostic and left untreated.

-34%

Cost per hectare

Compared to the Brazilian standard market model, on the same perimeter.

0%

Extra cost if establishment fails

Corrective actions included in the contract until reaching KPIs at M+12, M+24 and M+36.

Illustrative case, reconstructed from public references.

Cost per hectare, indexed

-34%
Standard approach100
With MORFO66

Where the −34% comes from

-15 to 20%

Early identification of non-plantable zones

About 20% of the farm is kept in natural regeneration or excluded from intervention. The standard model treats 100% of the perimeter, including zones where natural regeneration would be more effective than planting.

-8 to 17%

Zone-by-zone intensity calibration

On the planted area, each operation is adjusted zone by zone. Less herbicide where invasive pressure is low. Fewer seedlings where regeneration is already active. Less subsoiling where soil is loose.

-5 to 10%

Contractual risk transfer

In the MORFO model, corrective actions up to M+36 are included in the price. In the standard model, the replanting guarantee stops at 20% mortality; above that, the client pays again to correct.

Activity by activity

Standard approachWith MORFO

Index, base 100 = standard model. Lower is cheaper.

  • Machinery use-45%
  • Soil preparation-45%
  • Manual weeding-42%
  • Field labor-40%
  • Seedlings-38%
  • Planting fertilization-37%
  • Hydrogel-37%
  • Chemical weeding-35%
  • Treated surface-20%
  • Ant control-20%
  • Replanting (M+12)-100%

The overall figure is not the average of these lines. Each activity counts in proportion to its share of the total cost, so the activities that weigh most on a budget move the total most. The shares themselves are specific to this project and are not published.

The two models, side by side

Standard approachWith MORFO
Who produces the diagnosticClient or external consultantMORFO, included in the contract
Decision unitCadastral perimeterOperational zone
Planting recipeSingle, uniformCalibrated per zone
Areas in natural regenerationTreated like the restIdentified and excluded
Default density1,111 seedlings/haCalibrated per zone (0 to 1,600 seedlings/ha)
What is billedThe activities performedThe result achieved
Who pays if the forest doesn't establishThe clientMORFO
Contractual commitmentCompliance with the planKPIs at M+12, M+24, M+36

Send us your shapefile

We will run the same pre-analysis for your farm, at no cost. You receive a document like this example, with the zone stratification and a cost-reduction estimate calibrated for your area. No commercial commitment.

Send my shapefileResponse in less than 5 business days

Illustrative case reconstituted from public sector references. The standard model is calibrated on public technical proposals and the pricing grids of established forest restoration providers in Brazil. The MORFO model is based on the methodology applied to comparable sites in the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest. The figures are specific to this perimeter; your farm may differ depending on biome, size, soil condition, and land-use history.

The institutions behind the work

Backers and partners

  • Google Sustainability
  • Solar Impulse Foundation
  • Uplink
  • World Economic Forum
  • 1t.org
  • Climate Collective
  • Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
  • France 2030
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • UFSCar
  • IRD

In the press

  • Reuters
  • Forbes
  • World Economic Forum
  • O Globo
  • Nature4Climate

Any questions? Ask MORFINHO.

Our assistant answers in seconds, in your language.

MORFINHO can occasionally be wrong. For anything specific, contact the team.

Turn degraded land into a project that holds.

Send us an area. We will tell you if it is viable, and how.